Search Engine
Optimization Tip
Avoid This Trap When You Submit
Articles
by Diane Eble
If
you want to write a book, one of the best ways to start is by
writing articles and submitting them to online article
directories. Not only do you build some momentum in terms of
writing your book, you can test how people respond to your
ideas. Also, if you have a website, you can begin to attract
visitors who want to know more about what you have to
say.
Article syndication, which is what this
process is called, has been a key way for me to get traffic to
my site. In the process of learning how to use articles most
effectively, I discovered there is a potential trap to avoid.
If you fall into this trap, your website could fall lower in
the search engines than you would want. The trap is called
"duplicate content."
The Controversy Over
Duplicate Content
There's actually some controversy and lots of
confusion over this whole issue, so I did some research (with
the help of some readers of my blog). The controversy is over
whether your website would somehow be penalized by the search
engines if you have the same content on your site as there is
on lots of other sites that pick up your article. People were
saying that Google would give you a lower page rank for
duplicate content. Others were saying it was all
hogwash.
The truth seems to be that Google is in fact
concerned about duplicate content. Their complex algorithms
search for relevancy. They will list first the content they
feel is most relevant to the search for a particular keyword or
phrase. That means if your article appears on someone else's
website and seems more relevant to Google, it will list it
higher than that same article that's on your site.
The Word from
Google
Here's what Google says about
syndication:
"If you syndicate your content on other
sites, make sure they include a link back to the original
article on each syndicated article. Even with that, note that
we'll always show the (unblocked) version we think is most
appropriate for users in each given search, which may or may
not be the version you'd prefer."
(For a more in-depth discussion of this, read
my blog post, which also contains links to the
Official Google Web master
Central Blog and a thread with a
lot of questions and answers about various
issues.)
The bottom line seems to be that Google
doesn't apply a penalty so much as they filter and decide which
one will be the article/site they choose to list highest.
Of course, you want them to list your site highest, not someone
else's.
How to Keep Your
Search Engine Rank High
Here's what I do to deal with this issue
and help rather than hurt my search engine
ranking:
-
I
only have the full article on my site once instead of in
the newsletter archive page and a separate article
page
- The article on my site is at least 20
percent different from what I submit to the article
directories. Usually this means the headline and lead, the
most important parts of the article anyway.
- Before submitting an article to the
ezine directories, I make sure the article on my site is
first indexed by the search engines. This is easy to do:
Simply paste the entire page url, in quotes, into the major
search engine windows. (For example, I would put
"
http://www.yoursitename.com/nameofpage.html
" into Google, MSN, Yahoo, etc.). In a few days, I'll check
the search engines by putting the article title into the
search engine search box (in quotes so it searches for the
exact title). If it shows up from my site, then I'm ready
to syndicate the article.
Further Resources …
If you are interested
in learning more about the ins and outs of Internet article
writing, submission, and marketing, the real expert is
Chris Knight, owner of www.ezinearticles.com, one
of the biggest and best article directories.. There's tons of
great, free information on how to use articles to market, and
this is where lots of people go for content for their site.
(When they reprint it, they're supposed to include your name
and links.) Open an account and get acquainted with all the
amazing training and tools there.
|